Broadcast Date: Thursday, July 18, 2024
from 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm (ET)
Overview:
In today’s competitive job market, understanding the implications of the FTC’s Ban on Noncompete Clauses is essential for both employees and employers, as it significantly alters the landscape of employment agreements. By delving into the nuances of noncompete clauses within the framework of FTC regulations, participants will acquire valuable insights into effectively navigating these clauses and ensuring compliance with the latest legal developments.
Come and join a panel of prominent thought leaders and practitioners assembled by The Knowledge Group as they delve into the intricacies of noncompete clauses and gain a comprehensive understanding of the FTC’s ban in the realm of employment agreements. In this interactive course, you’ll gain valuable strategies for negotiating, modifying, or challenging noncompete agreements within the bounds of the FTC’s regulations.
Key issues that will be covered in this course are:
- FTC’s Ban on Noncompete Clauses
- Career Mobility and Innovation Implications
- Employee and Employer Rights
- Negotiating Fair Contract Terms
- Case Studies and Best Practices
Credit:
Course Level:
Intermediate
Advance Preparation:
Print and review course materials
Method of Presentation:
On-Demand Webcast
Prerequisite:
Basic Knowledge of Employment Contracts and Noncompete Agreements
Course Code:
1411214
Total Credits:
CLE Credit:
CA CLE 1.00 General - Approved Until: 07/18/2026
PA CLE 1.00 General - Approved Until: 7/18/2026
VT CLE 1:00 General - Approved Until: 12/31/2025
NJ CLE 1:00 General - Credits through Reciprocity
NY CLE 1:00 Skills - Credits through Reciprocity
AR CLE 1:00 General - Credits through Reciprocity
CT CLE 1:00 General - Credits through Reciprocity
NH CLE 1.00 General – Meets the requirements of NH Supreme Court Rule 53
MO CLE 1.00 General - Approved Until: 7/18/2024
MS CLE 1.00 General - Approved Until: 07/18/2025
Pending CLE Application:
GA, TN, WI
Self-Apply:
AL, CO, DE, FL, ID, IN, IO, KS, KY, LA, NC, ME, MN, MT, NE, NV, NM, ND, OH, OK, OR, SC, TX, UT, VA, WA, WV, WY
If you’d like us to apply for CLE, you may opt to pay the CLE processing fee here.
No MCLE Requirements:
DC, MD, MA, MI, SD
Not Eligible for CLE:
AK, AZ, HA, IL
How to Claim CLE Credits Per State:
https://knowledgewebcasts.com/how-to-claim-cle-credits-per-state/
CLE State Requirements:
https://knowledgewebcasts.com/cle-state-requirements/
CPE State Requirements:
Speaker Panel:
Matthew Crawford, Partner
Martenson, Hasbrouck & Simon LLP
Matt represents employers in all types of employment and labor related disputes, including proceedings in state and federal courts, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and state anti-discrimination agencies, the National Labor Relations Board, and before labor arbitrators. He has a strong record of successful and cost-effective resolution of cases.
Matt has particular expertise in the field of restrictive covenants. He has assisted numerous clients in drafting effective and enforceable agreements. He also has successfully litigated dozens of cases involving both enforcement of and challenges to restrictive covenant agreements, in numerous state and federal courts around the country.
Jonathan L. Sulds, Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jon’s record in his labor and employment practice, which spans virtually every aspect of the engagement, protection, management and reward of workforce resources, has earned him a spot in Lawdragon’s Hall of Fame of American Labor and Employment Lawyers, recognition by Lawdragon as one of the Nation’s Top 20 Lawyers in Traditional Labor Law, shortlisting by Benchmark Litigation as one of the Top 5 Employment Litigators for Management East of the Mississippi, Lawdragon’s naming him one of the Nation’s Most Powerful Employment Lawyers, repeated listings in Chambers, Best Lawyers, Super Lawyers and The Legal 500, plus designation as a Benchmark Litigation Labor and Employment Star.
Agenda:
Matthew Crawford, Partner
Martenson, Hasbrouck & Simon LLP
and
Jonathan L. Sulds, Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
- The most important takeaway is the extraordinary breadth of the rule. Outside of very narrowly defined circumstances, all non-compete agreements are going to be unlawful.
- Many of the comments submitted during the public comment period focused on the need for employers to still use non-compete agreements for high-level managerial employees. The FTC did create such an exception, but it is exceedingly narrow. It applies only to the highest level executives and is limited to agreements already in place as of the effective date of the agreement.
- Even the exception for “sale of business” is narrower than traditional common law and statutory rules regarding business sales.
- Although nominally limited to what we traditionally think of as true “non-compete agreements,” the rule could have impact on confidentiality and non-solicitation agreements. The importance of having those types of agreements exactly right is now heightened.
- Employers need to make plans to comply with the notice requirements of the law.
- The Rule is currently subject to a legal challenge. How the court rules will of course impact employer’s obligations under the new rule.
Date & Time:
Thursday, July 18, 2024
12:00 pm to 1:00 pm (ET)
Who Should Attend:
- Labor & Employment Lawyers
- Human Resources Professionals
- Chief Executive Officers
- Business Owners
- Compliance Officers
- Top Level Management
- General/In-House Counsel
Join Over 160,000 Professionals Empowering Their Careers
Learn anywhere from over 3000+ live and recorded CLE, CPE & Technology Webcasts.